{"id":1047,"date":"2024-11-07T23:53:44","date_gmt":"2024-11-07T21:53:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/?p=1047"},"modified":"2024-11-10T12:15:53","modified_gmt":"2024-11-10T10:15:53","slug":"ccr-neconstitutionalitatea-dispoitiilor-art-12-alin-1-din-legea-nr-50-1991-privind-autorizarea-executarii-lucrarilor-de-constructii-care-nu-permit-persoanelor-vatamate-sa-atace-la-instantele-de","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/07\/ccr-neconstitutionalitatea-dispoitiilor-art-12-alin-1-din-legea-nr-50-1991-privind-autorizarea-executarii-lucrarilor-de-constructii-care-nu-permit-persoanelor-vatamate-sa-atace-la-instantele-de\/","title":{"rendered":"CCR. Neconstitu\u021bionalitatea dispozi\u021biilor art. 12 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 50\/1991 privind autorizarea execut\u0103rii lucr\u0103rilor de construc\u0163ii, care nu permit persoanelor v\u0103t\u0103mate s\u0103 atace la instan\u021bele de contencios administrativ o autoriza\u021bie de construire sau de desfiin\u021bare a lucr\u0103rilor de construc\u021bii"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Conform unui comunicat de pres\u0103, publicat pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, \u00een \u0219edin\u021ba din data de 07 noiembrie 2024, Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103, \u00een cadrul controlului de constitu\u021bionalitate <em>a posteriori<\/em>, cu unanimitate de voturi:.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong>\u00a0<strong>A admis<\/strong> excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate \u0219i a constatat c\u0103 este neconstitu\u021bional\u0103 solu\u021bia legislativ\u0103 cuprins\u0103 la art. 12 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 50\/1991 privind autorizarea execut\u0103rii lucr\u0103rilor de construc\u0163ii, care nu permite persoanelor v\u0103t\u0103mate s\u0103 atace la instan\u021bele de contencios administrativ o autoriza\u021bie de construire sau de desfiin\u021bare a lucr\u0103rilor de construc\u021bii;<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. A admis<\/strong> excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate \u0219i a constatat c\u0103 este neconstitu\u021bional\u0103 solu\u021bia legislativ\u0103 cuprins\u0103 la art. 12 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 50\/1991 privind autorizarea execut\u0103rii lucr\u0103rilor de construc\u0163ii, care nu confer\u0103 efect suspensiv de drept ac\u021biunii \u00een anulare promovate de prefect \u00eempotriva unei autoriza\u021bii de construire sau de desfiin\u021bare a lucr\u0103rilor de construc\u021bii.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00cen esen\u021b\u0103<\/strong>, Curtea a constatat c\u0103, \u00een redactarea \u00een prezent \u00een vigoare, dispozi\u021biile art.12 alin.(1) din Legea nr.50\/1991 restr\u00e2ng sfera titularilor dreptului la ac\u021biune \u00een anularea autoriza\u021biilor de construire\/desfiin\u021bare, men\u021bion\u00e2ndu-l doar pe prefect ca unic titular, ceea ce contravine art.52 alin.(1) raportat la art.21 alin.(1) din Constitu\u021bie, sub aspectul dreptului constitu\u021bional al oric\u0103rei persoanei v\u0103t\u0103mate printr-un act administrativ de a se adresa justi\u021biei pentru ap\u0103rarea dreptului sau interesului s\u0103u legitim. \u00cen acela\u0219i timp, \u00eentruc\u00e2t dispozi\u021biile art.12 alin.(2) din aceea\u0219i lege prev\u0103d caracterul facultativ al suspend\u0103rii execut\u0103rii actului administrativ atacat de prefect, acestea \u00eencalc\u0103 art.123 alin.(5) din Constitu\u021bie, care confer\u0103 efect suspensiv de drept ac\u021biunii exercitate de prefect \u00een virtutea dreptului s\u0103u de tutel\u0103 administrativ\u0103.<\/p>\n<p><strong>&gt;&gt;\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ccr.ro\/comunicat-de-presa-7-noiembrie-2024\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Comunicatul CCR<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Conform unui comunicat de pres\u0103, publicat pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, \u00een \u0219edin\u021ba din data de 07 noiembrie 2024, Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103, \u00een cadrul controlului de constitu\u021bionalitate a posteriori, cu unanimitate de voturi:. 1.\u00a0A admis excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate \u0219i a constatat c\u0103 este neconstitu\u021bional\u0103 solu\u021bia legislativ\u0103 cuprins\u0103 la art. 12 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 50\/1991 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,12,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1047","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ccr","category-drept-administrativ","category-jurisprudenta"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1047","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1047"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1047\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1051,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1047\/revisions\/1051"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}