{"id":1067,"date":"2024-10-21T22:43:41","date_gmt":"2024-10-21T19:43:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/?p=1067"},"modified":"2024-11-30T20:46:19","modified_gmt":"2024-11-30T18:46:19","slug":"iccj-ril-admis-ref-grila-notariala-incidenta-in-ipoteza-in-care-instanta-stabileste-atat-existenta-dreptului-la-masuri-reparatorii-cat-si-numarul-de-puncte-care-se-acorda-persoanei-indreptatite-in","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/2024\/10\/21\/iccj-ril-admis-ref-grila-notariala-incidenta-in-ipoteza-in-care-instanta-stabileste-atat-existenta-dreptului-la-masuri-reparatorii-cat-si-numarul-de-puncte-care-se-acorda-persoanei-indreptatite-in\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00ceCCJ. RIL admis ref. grila notarial\u0103 incident\u0103, \u00een ipoteza \u00een care instan\u0163a stabile\u015fte at\u00e2t existen\u0163a dreptului la m\u0103suri reparatorii, c\u00e2t \u015fi num\u0103rul de puncte care se acord\u0103 persoanei \u00eendrept\u0103\u0163ite \u00een cadrul proceselor de restituire, \u00een natur\u0103 sau prin echivalent, a imobilelor preluate \u00een mod abuziv \u00een perioada regimului comunist \u00een Rom\u00e2nia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Conform unui comunicat disponibil pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, \u00een \u015fedin\u0163a din 21 octombrie 2024, \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie \u2013 Completul pentru solu\u0163ionarea recursurilor \u00een interesul legii, legal constituit \u00een cauz\u0103, a solu\u021bionat un recurs \u00een interesul legii, respectiv:<\/p>\n<p>Prin <strong>Decizia nr. 19\/2024<\/strong> din dosarul nr. 1598\/1\/2024, s-a pronun\u021bat urm\u0103toarea solu\u021bie obligatorie:<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201dAdmite recursul \u00een interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Cur\u021bii de Apel Pite\u0219ti \u0219i, \u00een consecin\u021b\u0103, stabile\u0219te c\u0103:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u00cen interpretarea \u015fi aplicarea unitar\u0103 a dispozi\u0163iilor art. 21 alin. (6) raportat la art. 35 alin. (1) \u015fi (3) din Legea nr. 165\/2013 privind m\u0103surile pentru finalizarea procesului de restituire, \u00een natur\u0103 sau prin echivalent, a imobilelor preluate \u00een mod abuziv \u00een perioada regimului comunist \u00een Rom\u00e2nia, cu modific\u0103rile \u015fi complet\u0103rile ulterioare, grila notarial\u0103 incident\u0103, \u00een ipoteza \u00een care instan\u0163a stabile\u015fte at\u00e2t existen\u0163a dreptului la m\u0103suri reparatorii, c\u00e2t \u015fi num\u0103rul de puncte care se acord\u0103 persoanei \u00eendrept\u0103\u0163ite, este cea valabil\u0103 \u00een anul anterior pronun\u021b\u0103rii hot\u0103r\u00e2rii judec\u0103tore\u0219ti.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Obligatorie, potrivit dispozi\u0163iilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een \u0219edin\u021b\u0103 public\u0103 ast\u0103zi, 21 octombrie 2024<\/em>.<em>\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>&gt;&gt;\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.iccj.ro\/2024\/10\/21\/comunicat-privind-decizia-pronuntata-in-recurs-in-interesul-legii-in-sedinta-din-21-octombrie-2024\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Comunicatul \u00ceCCJ<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Conform unui comunicat disponibil pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, \u00een \u015fedin\u0163a din 21 octombrie 2024, \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie \u2013 Completul pentru solu\u0163ionarea recursurilor \u00een interesul legii, legal constituit \u00een cauz\u0103, a solu\u021bionat un recurs \u00een interesul legii, respectiv: Prin Decizia nr. 19\/2024 din dosarul nr. 1598\/1\/2024, s-a pronun\u021bat urm\u0103toarea solu\u021bie obligatorie: \u201dAdmite [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,54,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1067","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drept-civil","category-iccj-ril","category-jurisprudenta"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1067","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1067"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1067\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1082,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1067\/revisions\/1082"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}