{"id":1107,"date":"2024-11-19T00:09:36","date_gmt":"2024-11-18T22:09:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/?p=1107"},"modified":"2024-12-01T18:18:27","modified_gmt":"2024-12-01T16:18:27","slug":"iccj-ril-admis-ref-imposibilitatea-recalcularii-pensiei-anticipate-partiale-stabilita-in-conditiile-art-65-alin-1-si-4-din-legea-nr-263-2010-prin-aplicarea-dispozitiilor-art-65-alin-5-din","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/19\/iccj-ril-admis-ref-imposibilitatea-recalcularii-pensiei-anticipate-partiale-stabilita-in-conditiile-art-65-alin-1-si-4-din-legea-nr-263-2010-prin-aplicarea-dispozitiilor-art-65-alin-5-din\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00ceCCJ. RIL admis ref. imposibilitatea recalcul\u0103rii pensiei anticipate par\u0163iale stabilit\u0103 \u00een condi\u0163iile art. 65 alin. (1) \u015fi (4) din Legea nr. 263\/2010 prin aplicarea dispozi\u0163iilor art. 65 alin. (5) din acela\u015fi act normativ"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Conform unui comunicat disponibil pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, \u00een \u015fedin\u0163a din 18 noiembrie 2024, \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie \u2013 Completul pentru solu\u0163ionarea recursurilor \u00een interesul legii, legal constituit \u00een cauz\u0103, a solu\u021bionat dou\u0103 recursuri \u00een interesul legii, respectiv:<\/p>\n<p>Prin <strong>Decizia nr. 21\/2024<\/strong> din dosarul nr. 2024\/1\/2024, s-a pronun\u021bat urm\u0103toarea solu\u021bie obligatorie:<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201dAdmite recursul \u00een interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Cur\u0163ii de Apel Gala\u0163i \u015fi, \u00een consecin\u0163\u0103, stabile\u015fte c\u0103:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u00cen interpretarea \u015fi aplicarea unitar\u0103 a art. 65 alin. (1), (4) \u015fi (5) din Legea nr. 263\/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modific\u0103rile \u015fi complet\u0103rile ulterioare, nu este posibil\u0103 recalcularea pensiei anticipate par\u0163iale stabilit\u0103 \u00een condi\u0163iile art. 65 alin. (1) \u015fi (4) din Legea nr. 263\/2010 prin aplicarea dispozi\u0163iilor art. 65 alin. (5) din acela\u015fi act normativ.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Obligatorie, potrivit art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een \u0219edin\u021b\u0103 public\u0103 ast\u0103zi, 18 noiembrie 2024<\/em><em>.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>&gt;&gt;\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.iccj.ro\/2024\/11\/18\/comunicat-privind-deciziile-pronuntate-in-recurs-in-interesul-legii-in-sedinta-din-18-noiembrie-2024\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Comunicatul \u00ceCCJ<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Conform unui comunicat disponibil pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, \u00een \u015fedin\u0163a din 18 noiembrie 2024, \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie \u2013 Completul pentru solu\u0163ionarea recursurilor \u00een interesul legii, legal constituit \u00een cauz\u0103, a solu\u021bionat dou\u0103 recursuri \u00een interesul legii, respectiv: Prin Decizia nr. 21\/2024 din dosarul nr. 2024\/1\/2024, s-a pronun\u021bat urm\u0103toarea solu\u021bie obligatorie: \u201dAdmite [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[57,54,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1107","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dreptul-asigurarilor-sociale","category-iccj-ril","category-jurisprudenta"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1107","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1107"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1107\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1110,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1107\/revisions\/1110"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1107"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1107"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1107"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}