{"id":578,"date":"2024-04-12T00:03:54","date_gmt":"2024-04-11T21:03:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/?p=578"},"modified":"2024-07-13T12:58:26","modified_gmt":"2024-07-13T09:58:26","slug":"ccr-solutionarea-fara-citarea-partilor-in-cauzele-penale-a-recursului-impotriva-incheierii-prin-care-instanta-se-pronunta-asupra-suspendarii-judecatii-ca-urmare-a-sesizarii-curtii-de-justitie-a-uni","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/2024\/04\/12\/ccr-solutionarea-fara-citarea-partilor-in-cauzele-penale-a-recursului-impotriva-incheierii-prin-care-instanta-se-pronunta-asupra-suspendarii-judecatii-ca-urmare-a-sesizarii-curtii-de-justitie-a-uni\/","title":{"rendered":"CCR. Solu\u021bionarea f\u0103r\u0103 citarea p\u0103r\u021bilor, \u00een cauzele penale, a recursului \u00eempotriva \u00eencheierii prin care instan\u021ba se pronun\u021b\u0103 asupra suspend\u0103rii judec\u0103\u021bii ca urmare a sesiz\u0103rii Cur\u021bii de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene este neconstitu\u021bional\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Conform unui comunicat de pres\u0103, publicat pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, \u00een \u0219edin\u021ba din data de 10 aprilie 2024, Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103, \u00een cadrul controlului de constitu\u021bionalitate <em>a posteriori<\/em>, cu majoritate de voturi, a admis excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate \u0219i a constatat c\u0103 solu\u021bia legislativ\u0103 cuprins\u0103 \u00een art. 2 alin. (5) din Legea nr. 340\/2009, potrivit c\u0103reia solu\u021bionarea, \u00een cauzele penale, a recursului \u00eempotriva \u00eencheierii prin care instan\u021ba se pronun\u021b\u0103 asupra suspend\u0103rii judec\u0103\u021bii ca urmare a sesiz\u0103rii Cur\u021bii de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene se realizeaz\u0103 \u201ef\u0103r\u0103 citarea p\u0103r\u021bilor\u201d este neconstitu\u021bional\u0103.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00cen esen\u021b\u0103, <\/strong>Curtea a re\u021binut c\u0103 solu\u021bionarea, \u00een cauzele penale, a recursului \u00eempotriva \u00eencheierii prin care instan\u021ba se pronun\u021b\u0103 asupra suspend\u0103rii judec\u0103\u021bii ca urmare a sesiz\u0103rii Cur\u021bii de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene doar cu participarea procurorului plaseaz\u0103 celelalte p\u0103r\u021bi \u00eentr-o pozi\u021bie dezavantajoas\u0103 fa\u021b\u0103 de reprezentantul Ministerului Public. Astfel, acestea nu se bucur\u0103 de posibilitatea real\u0103 de a aduce comentarii referitoare la tot ceea ce este avansat \u00een drept sau \u00een fapt de c\u0103tre procuror \u015fi la tot ceea ce este prezentat de acesta cu privire la procedura supus\u0103 judec\u0103\u021bii.<\/p>\n<p>Curtea a re\u021binut c\u0103, \u00een materie penal\u0103, principiul contradictorialit\u0103\u021bii, garan\u021bie a procesului echitabil, presupune c\u0103, at\u00e2t partea, c\u00e2t \u015fi procurorul trebuie s\u0103 beneficieze de posibilitatea de a avea cuno\u0219tin\u021b\u0103 \u015fi de a formula observa\u021bii referitoare la toate probele prezentate \u0219i\/sau la sus\u021binerile celeilalte p\u0103r\u021bi.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen consecin\u021b\u0103, Curtea a constatat c\u0103 solu\u021bia legislativ\u0103 cuprins\u0103 \u00een art. 2 alin. (5) din Legea nr. 340\/2009, potrivit c\u0103reia solu\u021bionarea, \u00een cauzele penale, a recursului \u00eempotriva \u00eencheierii prin care instan\u021ba se pronun\u021b\u0103 asupra suspend\u0103rii judec\u0103\u021bii ca urmare a sesiz\u0103rii Cur\u021bii de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene se realizeaz\u0103 \u201ef\u0103r\u0103 citarea p\u0103r\u021bilor\u201d, este neconstitu\u021bional\u0103, \u00eentruc\u00e2t \u00eencalc\u0103 art. 21 alin. (3) din Legea fundamental\u0103.<\/p>\n<p><strong>&gt;&gt;\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ccr.ro\/comunicat-de-presa-10-aprilie-2024\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Comunicatul CCR<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Conform unui comunicat de pres\u0103, publicat pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, \u00een \u0219edin\u021ba din data de 10 aprilie 2024, Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103, \u00een cadrul controlului de constitu\u021bionalitate a posteriori, cu majoritate de voturi, a admis excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate \u0219i a constatat c\u0103 solu\u021bia legislativ\u0103 cuprins\u0103 \u00een art. 2 alin. (5) din Legea nr. 340\/2009, potrivit c\u0103reia [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,55,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ccr","category-drept-procesual-penal","category-jurisprudenta"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=578"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/578\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":782,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/578\/revisions\/782"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}