{"id":652,"date":"2024-05-17T11:55:35","date_gmt":"2024-05-17T08:55:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/?p=652"},"modified":"2024-05-18T12:07:52","modified_gmt":"2024-05-18T09:07:52","slug":"tribunalul-caras-severin-contestatie-la-legea-electorala-decizia-civila-pronuntata-in-apel-atacata-cu-revizuire-inadmisibilitatea-caii-de-atac","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/2024\/05\/17\/tribunalul-caras-severin-contestatie-la-legea-electorala-decizia-civila-pronuntata-in-apel-atacata-cu-revizuire-inadmisibilitatea-caii-de-atac\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunalul Cara\u0219-Severin. Contesta\u021bie la legea electoral\u0103. Decizia civil\u0103 pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een apel, atacat\u0103 cu revizuire. Inadmisibilitatea c\u0103ii de atac"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201dTribunalul re\u0163ine c\u0103, potrivit art. 122 din Legea 115\/2015 modificat\u0103,
\n(1) Judecarea de c\u0103tre instan\u0163\u0103 a \u00eent\u00e2mpin\u0103rilor, contesta\u0163iilor \u015fi a oric\u0103ror altor cereri prev\u0103zute de prezenta lege se face potrivit regulilor stabilite de lege pentru ordonan\u0163a pre\u015fedin\u0163ial\u0103, cu participarea obligatorie a procurorului.
\n(2) \u00cempotriva hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor definitive, pronun\u0163ate de instan\u0163ele judec\u0103tore\u015fti potrivit prezentei legi, nu exist\u0103 cale de atac.<\/p>\n

Decizia a c\u0103rei revizuire se cere a fost solu\u0163ionat\u0103 sub imperiul Legii speciale nr. 115\/2015 modificat\u0103, av\u00e2nd ca obiect contesta\u0163ie \u00eempotriva Hot\u0103r\u00e2rii nr. 2\/2024 a Biroului Electoral de Circumscrip\u0163ie nr. 38 Forotic, privind propunerea de candidatur\u0103 a doamnei […] din partea Partidului […]\u00a0 […].<\/p>\n

Drept urmare, conform dispozi\u0163iilor legale mai sus enun\u0163ate, cererea de revizuire nu este prev\u0103zut\u0103 de legea special\u0103, nefiind stabilite alte c\u0103i de atac \u00eempotriva apelului a c\u0103rei revizuire se cere prin prezenta. Unde legea nu distinge, nici interpretul nu poate s\u0103 disting\u0103. Interpretarea autentic\u0103 a unei dispozi\u0163ii legale este dat\u0103 de \u00eensu\u015fi organul de stat care a edicat norma, nu de c\u0103tre instan\u0163\u0103.<\/p>\n

\u00cen ceea ce prive\u015fte temeiul de drept al cererii de revizuire motivat de c\u0103tre parte, respectiv art. 509 pct. 5 din C.pr.civ., tribunalul constat\u0103 c\u0103 este de principiu c\u0103 legea general\u0103 se aplic\u0103 \u00een orice materie \u015fi \u00een toate cazurile, mai pu\u0163in \u00een acelea \u00een care legiuitorul stabile\u015fte un regim special \u015fi derogatoriu, instituind \u00een anumite materii reglement\u0103ri speciale, care sunt prioritare fa\u0163\u0103 de norma de drept comun, ce \u00een astfel de situa\u0163ii se aplic\u0103 numai unde legea special\u0103 nu dispune.<\/p>\n

Aceea\u015fi este \u015fi pozi\u0163ia emis\u0103 de \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie, care a hot\u0103r\u00e2t c\u0103 \u00eenl\u0103turarea de la aplicare a legii generale ori de c\u00e2te ori exist\u0103 o dispozi\u0163ie special\u0103 \u00eentr-o materie dat\u0103, nu trebuie s\u0103 fie expres\u0103, fiind de la sine \u00een\u0163eleas\u0103, \u00eentruc\u00e2t este consecin\u0163a direct\u0103 a principiului specialia generalibus derogant.<\/p>\n

Ca o consecin\u0163\u0103 a acestui principiu, nu este permis\u0103 examinarea cererii de revizuire prin prisma dispozi\u0163iilor legale generale, \u00eenl\u0103tur\u00e2nd de la aplicare dispozi\u0163ia special\u0103 mai restrictive, respectiv a art. 122 din Legea 115\/2015 modificat\u0103.\u201d<\/p>\n

(decizia civil\u0103 nr. 201\/03.05.2024 a Tribunalului Cara\u0219-Severin – Sec\u021bia I civil\u0103, sursa: rejust.ro<\/a>)<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u201dTribunalul re\u0163ine c\u0103, potrivit art. 122 din Legea 115\/2015 modificat\u0103, (1) Judecarea de c\u0103tre instan\u0163\u0103 a \u00eent\u00e2mpin\u0103rilor, contesta\u0163iilor \u015fi a oric\u0103ror altor cereri prev\u0103zute de prezenta lege se face potrivit regulilor stabilite de lege pentru ordonan\u0163a pre\u015fedin\u0163ial\u0103, cu participarea obligatorie a procurorului. (2) \u00cempotriva hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor definitive, pronun\u0163ate de instan\u0163ele judec\u0103tore\u015fti potrivit prezentei legi, nu exist\u0103 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[161,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-652","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drept-electoral","category-jurisprudenta"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/652","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=652"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/652\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":654,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/652\/revisions\/654"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=652"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=652"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=652"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}