{"id":659,"date":"2024-05-22T00:07:35","date_gmt":"2024-05-21T21:07:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/?p=659"},"modified":"2024-05-21T22:08:52","modified_gmt":"2024-05-21T19:08:52","slug":"iccj-ril-admis-ref-interpretarea-si-aplicarea-unitara-a-dispozitiilor-art-75-alin-1-si-art-278-alin-1-din-codul-muncii-privind-calculul-termenului-de-preaviz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/2024\/05\/22\/iccj-ril-admis-ref-interpretarea-si-aplicarea-unitara-a-dispozitiilor-art-75-alin-1-si-art-278-alin-1-din-codul-muncii-privind-calculul-termenului-de-preaviz\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00ceCCJ. RIL admis ref. interpretarea \u0219i aplicarea unitar\u0103 a dispozi\u021biilor art. 75 alin. (1) \u0219i art. 278 alin. (1) din Codul muncii, privind calculul termenului de preaviz"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Conform unui comunicat disponibil pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, \u00een \u015fedin\u0163a din 20 mai 2024, \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie \u2013 Completul pentru solu\u0163ionarea recursurilor \u00een interesul legii, legal constituit \u00een cauz\u0103, a solu\u021bionat dou\u0103 recursuri \u00een interesul legii, respectiv:<\/p>\n<p>Prin <strong>Decizia nr. 8\/2024<\/strong> din dosarul nr. 471\/1\/2024, s-a pronun\u021bat urm\u0103toare solu\u021bie obligatorie:<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201dAdmite recursul \u00een interesul legii formulat de Avocatul Poporului \u0219i, \u00een consecin\u021b\u0103, stabile\u0219te c\u0103:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u00cen interpretarea \u0219i aplicarea unitar\u0103 a dispozi\u021biilor art. 75 alin. (1) \u0219i art. 278 alin. (1) din Codul muncii, termenul de preaviz \u00eencepe s\u0103 curg\u0103 din ziua urm\u0103toare comunic\u0103rii notific\u0103rii de preaviz \u015fi se \u00eempline\u015fte \u00een ultima zi a termenului, dispozi\u021biile art. 181 alin. (1) pct. 2 \u0219i alin. (2) din Codul de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103, precum \u0219i cele ale art. 2.553 alin. (1) din Codul civil nefiind aplicabile.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Obligatorie, potrivit dispozi\u021biilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een \u0219edin\u021b\u0103 public\u0103 ast\u0103zi, 20 mai 2024<\/em><em>.<\/em><em>\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>&gt;&gt;\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.iccj.ro\/2024\/05\/20\/comunicat-privind-deciziile-pronuntate-in-recurs-in-interesul-legii-in-sedinta-din-20-mai-2024\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Comunicatul \u00ceCCJ<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Conform unui comunicat disponibil pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, \u00een \u015fedin\u0163a din 20 mai 2024, \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie \u2013 Completul pentru solu\u0163ionarea recursurilor \u00een interesul legii, legal constituit \u00een cauz\u0103, a solu\u021bionat dou\u0103 recursuri \u00een interesul legii, respectiv: Prin Decizia nr. 8\/2024 din dosarul nr. 471\/1\/2024, s-a pronun\u021bat urm\u0103toare solu\u021bie obligatorie: \u201dAdmite [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17,54,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-659","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dreptul-muncii","category-iccj-ril","category-jurisprudenta"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/659","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=659"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/659\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":662,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/659\/revisions\/662"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=659"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=659"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=659"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}