{"id":709,"date":"2024-06-11T20:53:51","date_gmt":"2024-06-11T17:53:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/?p=709"},"modified":"2024-06-12T21:16:44","modified_gmt":"2024-06-12T18:16:44","slug":"directiva-2011-95-ue-a-parlamentului-european-si-a-consiliului-din-13-decembrie-2011-privind-standardele-referitoare-la-conditiile-pe-care-trebuie-sa-le-indeplineasca-resortisantii-tarilor-terte-sau-c","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/2024\/06\/11\/directiva-2011-95-ue-a-parlamentului-european-si-a-consiliului-din-13-decembrie-2011-privind-standardele-referitoare-la-conditiile-pe-care-trebuie-sa-le-indeplineasca-resortisantii-tarilor-terte-sau-c\/","title":{"rendered":"CJUE. Cauza C-646\/21 – Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Femei care se identific\u0103 cu valoarea egalit\u0103\u021bii \u00eentre sexe)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Conform unui comunicat de pres\u0103 publicat la data de 11 iunie 2024 pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, Curtea de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene (CJUE) a statuat, \u00een cauza C-646\/21 – Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid<\/a> c\u0103, femeile, inclusiv cele minore, care \u00eemp\u0103rt\u0103\u0219esc ca o caracteristic\u0103 comun\u0103 identificarea efectiv\u0103 cu valoarea fundamental\u0103 a egalit\u0103\u021bii \u00eentre femei \u0219i b\u0103rba\u021bi, intervenit\u0103 \u00een cursul \u0219ederii lor \u00eentr-un stat membru, pot, \u00een func\u021bie de condi\u021biile existente \u00een \u021bara de origine, s\u0103 fie considerate ca apar\u021bin\u00e2nd unui \u201eanumit grup social\u201d ca \u201emotiv de persecu\u021bie\u201d care poate conduce la recunoa\u0219terea statutului de refugiat.<\/p>\n

Dou\u0103 adolescente irakiene locuiesc f\u0103r\u0103 \u00eentrerupere din 2015 \u00een \u021a\u0103rile de Jos. \u00cen urma respingerii cererilor lor ini\u021biale de protec\u021bie interna\u021bional\u0103, acestea au introdus cereri ulterioare. Ele au ar\u0103tat \u00een sus\u021binerea acestor cereri c\u0103, \u00een urma \u0219ederii lor \u00eendelungate \u00een \u021a\u0103rile de Jos, au adoptat normele, valorile \u0219i comportamentele tinerilor de v\u00e2rsta lor din aceast\u0103 societate. \u00cen cazul \u00eentoarcerii \u00een Irak, acestea consider\u0103 c\u0103 sunt incapabile s\u0103 se conformeze normelor unei societ\u0103\u021bi care nu acord\u0103 femeilor \u0219i fetelor acelea\u0219i drepturi ca cele de care dispun b\u0103rba\u021bii \u0219i se tem c\u0103 vor fi expuse unui risc de persecu\u021bie din cauza identit\u0103\u021bii pe care \u0219i-au format-o \u00een \u021a\u0103rile de Jos.<\/p>\n

Cererile ulterioare men\u021bionate au fost de asemenea respinse de autorit\u0103\u021bile neerlandeze, iar aceste tinere femei au sesizat instan\u021ba neerlandez\u0103 care a decis s\u0103 solicite Cur\u021bii de Justi\u021bie s\u0103 se pronun\u021be cu privire la interpretarea Directivei 2011\/95 privind protec\u021bia interna\u021bional\u0103, care stabile\u0219te condi\u021biile de acordare a statutului de refugiat de care pot beneficia resortisan\u021bii \u021b\u0103rilor ter\u021be. Acest statut este prev\u0103zut pentru cazurile de persecu\u021bie a oric\u0103rui resortisant al unei \u021b\u0103ri ter\u021be pe motiv de ras\u0103, religie, cet\u0103\u021benie, opinii politice sau apartenen\u021b\u0103 la un anumit grup social[1].<\/p>\n

\u00cen hot\u0103r\u00e2rea sa, Curtea statueaz\u0103 c\u0103 femeile, inclusiv cele minore, care \u00eemp\u0103rt\u0103\u0219esc ca o caracteristic\u0103 comun\u0103 identificarea efectiv\u0103 cu valoarea fundamental\u0103 a egalit\u0103\u021bii \u00eentre femei \u0219i b\u0103rba\u021bi, intervenit\u0103 \u00een cursul \u0219ederii lor \u00eentr-un stat membru, pot, \u00een func\u021bie de condi\u021biile existente \u00een \u021bara de origine, s\u0103 fie considerate ca apar\u021bin\u00e2nd unui \u201eanumit grup social\u201d, ca \u201emotiv de persecu\u021bie\u201d care poate conduce la recunoa\u0219terea statutului de refugiat.<\/p>\n

Ea precizeaz\u0103 c\u0103, \u00een cazul \u00een care un solicitant de protec\u021bie interna\u021bional\u0103 este minor, autorit\u0103\u021bile na\u021bionale trebuie s\u0103 \u021bin\u0103 seama \u00een mod necesar de interesul s\u0103u superior \u00een cadrul unei examin\u0103ri individuale privind temeinicia cererii de protec\u021bie interna\u021bional\u0103 depuse de acest minor.<\/p>\n

\u00cen plus, pentru a evalua o cerere de protec\u021bie interna\u021bional\u0103 \u00eentemeiat\u0103 pe un motiv de persecu\u021bie precum \u201eapartenen\u021ba la un anumit grup social\u201d, poate fi luat\u0103 \u00een considerare o \u0219edere \u00eendelungat\u0103 \u00eentr-un stat membru, mai ales atunci c\u00e2nd coincide cu o perioad\u0103 \u00een care un solicitant minor \u0219i-a format identitatea.<\/p>\n

\n

[1] Directiva 2011\/95\/UE a Parlamentului European \u0219i a Consiliului din 13 decembrie 2011 privind standardele referitoare la condi\u021biile pe care trebuie s\u0103 le \u00eendeplineasc\u0103 resortisan\u021bii \u021b\u0103rilor ter\u021be sau apatrizii pentru a putea beneficia de protec\u021bie interna\u021bional\u0103, la un statut uniform pentru refugia\u021bi sau pentru persoanele eligibile pentru ob\u021binerea de protec\u021bie subsidiar\u0103 \u0219i la con\u021binutul protec\u021biei acordate<\/small>.<\/small><\/p>\n

\n

>>\u00a0Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea integral\u0103<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Conform unui comunicat de pres\u0103 publicat la data de 11 iunie 2024 pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, Curtea de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene (CJUE) a statuat, \u00een cauza C-646\/21 – Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid c\u0103, femeile, inclusiv cele minore, care \u00eemp\u0103rt\u0103\u0219esc ca o caracteristic\u0103 comun\u0103 identificarea efectiv\u0103 cu valoarea fundamental\u0103 a egalit\u0103\u021bii \u00eentre femei […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[92,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-709","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cjue","category-jurisprudenta"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/709","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=709"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/709\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":712,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/709\/revisions\/712"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=709"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}