{"id":817,"date":"2024-07-29T21:51:36","date_gmt":"2024-07-29T18:51:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/?p=817"},"modified":"2024-08-02T11:59:41","modified_gmt":"2024-08-02T08:59:41","slug":"cjue-cauzele-conexate-c-112-22-cu-si-c-223-22-nd-asistenta-sociala-accesul-resortisantilor-tarilor-terte-care-sunt-rezidenti-pe-termen-lung-la-o-masura-de-securitate-sociala-de-asistenta-sociala-s","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/2024\/07\/29\/cjue-cauzele-conexate-c-112-22-cu-si-c-223-22-nd-asistenta-sociala-accesul-resortisantilor-tarilor-terte-care-sunt-rezidenti-pe-termen-lung-la-o-masura-de-securitate-sociala-de-asistenta-sociala-s\/","title":{"rendered":"CJUE. Cauzele conexate C-112\/22 CU \u0219i C-223\/22 ND. Asisten\u021b\u0103 social\u0103: accesul resortisan\u021bilor \u021b\u0103rilor ter\u021be care sunt reziden\u021bi pe termen lung la o m\u0103sur\u0103 de securitate social\u0103, de asisten\u021b\u0103 social\u0103 sau de protec\u021bie social\u0103 nu poate fi supus condi\u021biei de a fi avut re\u0219edin\u021ba timp de cel pu\u021bin zece ani \u00eentr-un stat membru"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Conform unui comunicat de pres\u0103 publicat la data de 29 iulie 2024 pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, Curtea de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene (CJUE) a statuat, \u00een <a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/documents.jsf?num=C-112\/22\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">cauzele conexate C-112\/22 CU \u0219i C-223\/22 ND<\/a>, c\u0103 accesul resortisan\u021bilor \u021b\u0103rilor ter\u021be care sunt reziden\u021bi pe termen lung la o m\u0103sur\u0103 de securitate social\u0103, de asisten\u021b\u0103 social\u0103 sau de protec\u021bie social\u0103 nu poate fi supus condi\u021biei de a fi avut re\u0219edin\u021ba timp de cel pu\u021bin zece ani \u00eentr-un stat membru.<\/p>\n<p>Un stat membru nu poate supune accesul resortisan\u021bilor \u021b\u0103rilor ter\u021be care sunt reziden\u021bi pe termen lung la o m\u0103sur\u0103 de securitate social\u0103, de asisten\u021b\u0103 social\u0103 sau de protec\u021bie social\u0103 condi\u021biei, care se aplic\u0103 \u0219i resortisan\u021bilor statului membru respectiv, de a fi avut re\u0219edin\u021ba \u00een acest stat membru de cel pu\u021bin zece ani, dintre care ultimii doi ani \u00een mod continuu. De asemenea, i se interzice s\u0103 sanc\u021bioneze penal o declara\u021bie fals\u0103 referitoare la o asemenea condi\u021bie privind re\u0219edin\u021ba ilegal\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>Dou\u0103 resortisante ale unor \u021b\u0103ri ter\u021be care sunt rezidente pe termen lung \u00een Italia sunt acuzate de s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219irea unei infrac\u021biuni penale. Astfel, acestea ar fi semnat cereri \u00een vederea ob\u021binerii \u201evenitului de cet\u0103\u021benie\u201d, o presta\u021bie social\u0103 prin care se urm\u0103re\u0219te asigurarea unui minim de subzisten\u021b\u0103. Acestea ar fi atestat \u00een mod fals c\u0103 \u00eendeplineau condi\u021biile de acordare a acestei presta\u021bii, inclusiv condi\u021bia privind re\u0219edin\u021ba cu o durat\u0103 de cel pu\u021bin zece ani \u00een Italia, dintre care ultimii doi ani \u00een mod continuu. Ele ar fi primit \u00een mod nejustificat, \u00een acest temei, o sum\u0103 total\u0103 de 3 414,40 euro \u0219i, respectiv, de 3 186,66 euro. Tribunalul din Napoli (Italia) solicit\u0103 Cur\u021bii de Justi\u021bie s\u0103 stabileasc\u0103 dac\u0103 aceast\u0103 condi\u021bie privind re\u0219edin\u021ba este conform\u0103 cu Directiva privind resortisan\u021bii \u021b\u0103rilor ter\u021be care sunt reziden\u021bi pe termen lung[1].<\/p>\n<p>Curtea consider\u0103, mai \u00eent\u00e2i, c\u0103 respectiva condi\u021bie privind re\u0219edin\u021ba\u00a0<strong>constituie o discriminare indirect\u0103 fa\u021b\u0103 de resortisan\u021bii \u021b\u0103rilor ter\u021be care sunt reziden\u021bi pe termen lung.<\/strong>\u00a0Astfel, chiar dac\u0103 aceast\u0103 condi\u021bie se aplic\u0103 \u0219i resortisan\u021bilor na\u021bionali, ea afecteaz\u0103 \u00een principal cet\u0103\u021benii str\u0103ini, printre care figureaz\u0103 \u00een special ace\u0219ti resortisan\u021bi ai \u021b\u0103rilor ter\u021be.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen continuare, Curtea examineaz\u0103 dac\u0103 aceast\u0103 diferen\u021b\u0103 de tratament poate fi justificat\u0103 de diferen\u021ba dintre leg\u0103turile resortisan\u021bilor na\u021bionali \u0219i, respectiv, ale resortisan\u021bilor \u021b\u0103rilor ter\u021be care sunt reziden\u021bi pe termen lung cu statul membru \u00een cauz\u0103. Curtea constat\u0103 c\u0103\u00a0<strong>directiva prevede o condi\u021bie privind re\u0219edin\u021ba legal\u0103 \u0219i ne\u00eentrerupt\u0103 de cinci ani pe teritoriul unui stat membru<\/strong>\u00a0pentru ca un resortisant al unei \u021b\u0103ri ter\u021be s\u0103 poat\u0103 avea statutul de rezident pe termen lung. Legiuitorul Uniunii a considerat\u00a0<strong>aceast\u0103 perioad\u0103 ca fiind suficient\u0103 pentru a avea dreptul la egalitate de tratament<\/strong>\u00a0cu cel aplicat resortisan\u021bilor statului membru respectiv, \u00een special \u00een ceea ce prive\u0219te m\u0103surile de securitate social\u0103, de asisten\u021b\u0103 social\u0103 \u0219i de protec\u021bie social\u0103. Prin urmare,\u00a0<strong>un stat membru nu poate s\u0103 prelungeasc\u0103 unilateral perioada de \u0219edere impus\u0103 de directiv\u0103<\/strong>\u00a0pentru ca un resortisant al unei \u021b\u0103ri ter\u021be care este rezident pe termen lung s\u0103 poat\u0103 beneficia de un tratament egal cu cel aplicat resortisan\u021bilor acestui stat membru \u00een materie de acces la o asemenea m\u0103sur\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen sf\u00e2r\u0219it, Curtea arat\u0103 c\u0103\u00a0<strong>se interzice de asemenea statului membru \u00een cauz\u0103 s\u0103 sanc\u021bioneze penal<\/strong>\u00a0o declara\u021bie fals\u0103 referitoare la o condi\u021bie privind re\u0219edin\u021ba care \u00eencalc\u0103 dreptul Uniunii.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><small>[1]\u00a0Directiva 2003\/109\/CE\u00a0a Consiliului din 25 noiembrie 2003 privind statutul resortisan\u021bilor \u021b\u0103rilor ter\u021be care sunt reziden\u021bi pe termen lung.<\/small><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>&gt;&gt; <a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf;jsessionid=89E20E369EAD3CF467F7636C3EE017C4?text=&amp;docid=288832&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=RO&amp;mode=req&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=807976\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea integral\u0103<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Conform unui comunicat de pres\u0103 publicat la data de 29 iulie 2024 pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, Curtea de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene (CJUE) a statuat, \u00een cauzele conexate C-112\/22 CU \u0219i C-223\/22 ND, c\u0103 accesul resortisan\u021bilor \u021b\u0103rilor ter\u021be care sunt reziden\u021bi pe termen lung la o m\u0103sur\u0103 de securitate social\u0103, de asisten\u021b\u0103 social\u0103 sau [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[92,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-817","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cjue","category-jurisprudenta"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/817","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=817"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/817\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":818,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/817\/revisions\/818"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=817"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=817"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=817"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}