{"id":963,"date":"2024-09-26T23:01:19","date_gmt":"2024-09-26T20:01:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/?p=963"},"modified":"2024-09-28T10:08:57","modified_gmt":"2024-09-28T07:08:57","slug":"cjue-cauza-c-792-22-energotehnica-dreptul-la-o-cale-de-atac-efectiva-judecatorul-national-nu-este-obligat-sa-aplice-o-decizie-a-curtii-sale-constitutionale-care-incalca-dreptul-uniunii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/2024\/09\/26\/cjue-cauza-c-792-22-energotehnica-dreptul-la-o-cale-de-atac-efectiva-judecatorul-national-nu-este-obligat-sa-aplice-o-decizie-a-curtii-sale-constitutionale-care-incalca-dreptul-uniunii\/","title":{"rendered":"CJUE. Cauza C-792\/22 &#8211; Energotehnica. Dreptul la o cale de atac efectiv\u0103: judec\u0103torul na\u021bional nu este obligat s\u0103 aplice o decizie a cur\u021bii sale constitu\u021bionale care \u00eencalc\u0103 dreptul Uniunii"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Conform unui comunicat de pres\u0103 publicat la data de 26 septembrie pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, Curtea de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene (CJUE) a statuat, \u00een <a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/documents.jsf?num=C-792\/22\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">cauza C-792\/22 &#8211; Energotehnica<\/a>, c\u0103 judec\u0103torul na\u021bional nu este obligat s\u0103 aplice o decizie a cur\u021bii sale constitu\u021bionale care \u00eencalc\u0103 dreptul Uniunii.<\/p>\n<div class=\"narrowcolumn\">\n<p><em>\u00cen asemenea cazuri, judec\u0103torul na\u021bional nu poate fi sanc\u021bionat<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u00cen urma decesului prin electrocutare a unui electrician \u00een timpul unei interven\u021bii, a fost ini\u021biat\u0103 o procedur\u0103 administrativ\u0103 \u00eempotriva angajatorului s\u0103u. \u00cen paralel, s-a declan\u0219at o procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 \u00eempotriva maistrului electrician pentru nerespectarea m\u0103surilor legale de securitate \u0219i s\u0103n\u0103tate \u00een munc\u0103 \u0219i pentru ucidere din culp\u0103. Rudele victimei au intervenit, de asemenea, \u00een procedura penal\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>Instan\u021ba de contencios administrativ sesizat\u0103 cu litigiul a conchis c\u0103, \u00een spe\u021b\u0103, nu era vorba despre un \u201eaccident de munc\u0103\u201d. Ea a anulat sanc\u021biunile administrative aplicate angajatorului. Potrivit unei legisla\u021bii na\u021bionale, astfel cum a fost interpretat\u0103 de Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei, aceast\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2re a instan\u021bei de contencios administrativ \u00eempiedic\u0103 instan\u021ba penal\u0103 s\u0103 reexamineze aspectul dac\u0103 accidentul respectiv constituie un accident de munc\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen acest context, Curtea de Apel Bra\u0219ov (Rom\u00e2nia) solicit\u0103 Cur\u021bii de Justi\u021bie s\u0103 se pronun\u021be cu privire la compatibilitatea acestei legi na\u021bionale, astfel cum a fost interpretat\u0103 de Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei, cu dreptul Uniunii privind securitatea lucr\u0103torilor[1].<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen hot\u0103r\u00e2rea pronun\u021bat\u0103 ast\u0103zi, Curtea de Justi\u021bie consider\u0103 c\u0103\u00a0<strong>dreptul Uniunii se opune legii unui stat membru \u00een temeiul c\u0103reia, potrivit cur\u021bii sale constitu\u021bionale, hot\u0103r\u00e2rea judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 definitiv\u0103 a unei instan\u021be de contencios administrativ privind un \u201eaccident de munc\u0103\u201d are autoritate de lucru judecat \u00een fa\u021ba instan\u021bei penale, dac\u0103 aceast\u0103 lege \u00eempiedic\u0103 rudele victimei s\u0103 fie ascultate.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dreptul Uniunii[2] urm\u0103re\u0219te s\u0103 protejeze securitatea lucr\u0103torilor \u0219i oblig\u0103 angajatorul s\u0103 asigure un mediu de lucru sigur. Este de competen\u021ba na\u021bional\u0103 s\u0103 se stabileasc\u0103 procedurile pentru angajarea r\u0103spunderii angajatorului \u00een cazul ne\u00eendeplinirii acestei obliga\u021bii. Aceste proceduri nu pot \u00eens\u0103 \u00eempiedica exercitarea drepturilor conferite de dreptul Uniunii.<\/p>\n<p>Or, Curtea aminte\u0219te c\u0103, \u00een procedurile judiciare, dreptul la o cale de atac efectiv\u0103 include dreptul de a fi ascultat. Dac\u0103 o instan\u021b\u0103 ia o decizie cu privire la r\u0103spunderea civil\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 a permite p\u0103r\u021bilor vizate s\u0103 \u00ee\u0219i prezinte argumentele, acest drept este \u00eenc\u0103lcat.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen aceast\u0103 privin\u021b\u0103, Curtea afirm\u0103 c\u0103 judec\u0103torii na\u021bionali trebuie s\u0103 poat\u0103 s\u0103 nu urmeze o decizie a cur\u021bii lor constitu\u021bionale dac\u0103 aceast\u0103 decizie contravine dreptului Uniunii. \u00centr-o asemenea situa\u021bie, ei nu pot face obiectul unor sanc\u021biuni disciplinare.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><small>[1]\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/eli\/dir\/1989\/391\/oj?eliuri=eli%3Adir%3A1989%3A391%3Aoj&amp;locale=ro\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Directiva 89\/391\/CEE<\/a>\u00a0a Consiliului din 12 iunie 1989 privind punerea \u00een aplicare de m\u0103suri pentru promovarea \u00eembun\u0103t\u0103\u021birii securit\u0103\u021bii \u0219i s\u0103n\u0103t\u0103\u021bii lucr\u0103torilor la locul de munc\u0103.<br \/>\n[2] Directiva 89\/391\/CEE coroborat\u0103 cu articolul 31 din cart\u0103 \u0219i cu principiul efectivit\u0103\u021bii.<\/small><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>&gt;&gt; <a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf;jsessionid=1F4694F1D338AB8A5EC3B25F9C43BACD?text=&amp;docid=290412&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=RO&amp;mode=req&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=2243408\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea integral\u0103<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Conform unui comunicat de pres\u0103 publicat la data de 26 septembrie pe pagina oficial\u0103 de internet, Curtea de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene (CJUE) a statuat, \u00een cauza C-792\/22 &#8211; Energotehnica, c\u0103 judec\u0103torul na\u021bional nu este obligat s\u0103 aplice o decizie a cur\u021bii sale constitu\u021bionale care \u00eencalc\u0103 dreptul Uniunii. \u00cen asemenea cazuri, judec\u0103torul na\u021bional nu poate [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[92,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-963","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cjue","category-jurisprudenta"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/963","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=963"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/963\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":964,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/963\/revisions\/964"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gazetajuridica.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}